Juralogium Emblem
JuralogiumThe Architecture of Law
#platform-framing-immunityActive Circuit SplitPlatform Liability & Intermediary Immunity
Read on Primary Statutory Source

Server Test & Inline Web Embed Framing

Statutory Hook: 17 U.S.C. § 106(5) (Public Display Right)

Whether embedding, framing, or in-line linking to third-party hosted content violates the public display right under 17 U.S.C. § 106(5).

Doctrinal Framework & Legal Mechanics

Under the Ninth Circuit's 'Server Test' formulated in Perfect 10 v. Amazon (2007), a website does not display a copyrighted image in violation of 17 U.S.C. § 106(5) unless a copy of the image is physically hosted on the website's own servers. Inline embedding or framing third-party content is merely providing HTML navigation instructions. However, Southern District of New York courts in Goldman v. Breitbart explicitly rejected the Server Test, holding that framing content to appear directly on an end-user page violates the public display right regardless of hosting location.

Inter-Circuit Tension & Jurisdictional Split

Major split between Ninth Circuit (adhering to Server Test) and Second Circuit district courts (rejecting Server Test in favor of user-facing display perception).

Benchmark Precedents (2)
Leading judicial decisions governing this sub-discipline

Perfect 10, Inc. v. Amazon.com, Inc.

Decided / Filed (2007)
External Benchmark Precedent

Goldman v. Breitbart News Network

Decided / Filed (2018)
External Benchmark Precedent
Engineering & Architecture Compliance Advisory
Do not rely solely on client-side iframe or HTML embed framing to avoid copyright licensing if your application serves users in Second Circuit jurisdictions (New York). Maintain direct image hosting agreements or explicit social media API licenses.
Cross-Entity Knowledge Graph Matrix