# Juralogium — Complete Machine-Readable Architectural Corpus
> Domain: https://juralogium.com
> System Type: Autonomous Jurisprudential Knowledge Graph & Operating Atlas
> Standard: AEO/GEO Compliant Corpus (2026)

## 1. 15 Core Practice Areas & Disciplines
- IP & Copyright Law (Title 17)
- Patent Law & Innovation (Title 35)
- Trademark, Trade Dress & Unfair Competition (15 U.S.C. § 1125)
- Telecommunications, Platform Liability & Safe Harbors (47 U.S.C. § 230, § 512)
- Autonomous Systems, Robotics & Kinematic Tort Law
- Neurotechnology, Cognitive Liberty & Neurorights (Colo. Rev. Stat. § 6-1-1303)
- Spatial Computing, XR & Spatial Property Law
- Algorithmic Antitrust, Pricing Coordination & Compute Allocation (15 U.S.C. § 1)
- Space Law, Astrolaw & Orbital Governance (18 U.S.T. 2410)
- Synthetic Biology, Genetics & Bio-Jurisprudence
- Labor, Occupational Health & Algorithmic Workplace Law (29 U.S.C. § 654, NYC Local Law 144, 42 U.S.C. § 2000e-2(k))
- Post-Mortem Persona Rights & Digital Estates (NO FAKES Act)
- Digital Evidence, Chain of Custody & Forensic Verification (FRE 901)
- Compute Infrastructure, Energy Law & Data Center Ecology (16 U.S.C. § 824)
- Consumer Financial Tech, Automated Underwriting & Algorithmic Credit (15 U.S.C. § 1691)

## 2. 22 Landmark Precedential Dossiers
1. Campbell v. Acuff-Rose Music, 510 U.S. 569 (1994) [Fair Use Transformativeness]
2. Andy Warhol Foundation v. Goldsmith, 598 U.S. 508 (2023) [Commercial Substitution]
3. Google LLC v. Oracle America, 593 U.S. 1 (2021) [Declaring Code Interoperability]
4. Authors Guild v. Google, 804 F.3d 202 (2d Cir. 2015) [Computational Ingestion]
5. Alice Corp. v. CLS Bank, 573 U.S. 208 (2014) [Software Patent Eligibility]
6. Qualitex Co. v. Jacobson Products, 514 U.S. 159 (1995) [Single-Color Trade Dress]
7. Scola v. Facebook, Inc., No. CGC-18-570119 (Cal. Super. Ct. 2020) [Moderator PTSD Liability]
8. Mobley v. Workday, Inc., No. 23-cv-00770 (N.D. Cal. 2024) [Algorithmic Hiring Bias & Agency Liability]
9. Griggs v. Duke Power Co., 401 U.S. 424 (1971) [Disparate Impact Bedrock]
10. Association for Molecular Pathology v. Myriad Genetics, 569 U.S. 576 (2013) [Natural DNA Isolation Bar]
11. Regents of Univ. of California v. Broad Institute, 903 F.3d 1286 (Fed. Cir. 2018) [CRISPR Eukaryotic Non-Obviousness]
12. United States v. RealPage, Inc., No. 1:24-cv-00710 (M.D.N.C. 2024) [Algorithmic Cartels]
13. In re DISH Operating L.L.C., DA 23-888 (FCC 2023) [Orbital Debris Liability]
14. Bleistein v. Donaldson Lithographing Co., 188 U.S. 239 (1903) [Aesthetic Non-Discrimination]
15. Burrow-Giles Lithographic Co. v. Sarony, 111 U.S. 53 (1884) [Mechanical Device Authorship]
16. Sony Corp. v. Universal City Studios, 464 U.S. 417 (1984) [Betamax Dual-Use Safe Harbor]
17. Feist Publications v. Rural Telephone Service, 499 U.S. 340 (1991) [Sweat of the Brow Repudiation]
18. Midler v. Ford Motor Co., 849 F.2d 460 (9th Cir. 1988) [Common Law Voice Appropriation]
19. Diamond v. Chakrabarty, 447 U.S. 303 (1980) [Engineered Organisms Patent Eligibility]
20. Daubert v. Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals, 509 U.S. 579 (1993) [Judicial Gatekeeping & Scientific Evidence]
21. State v. Loomis, 881 N.W.2d 749 (Wis. 2016) [Algorithmic Due Process & COMPAS Warnings]
22. Hermès International v. Rothschild, 663 F. Supp. 3d 318 (S.D.N.Y. 2023) [MetaBirkins Virtual Asset Trade Dress]

## 3. 8 Federal Circuit Splits Matrix
1. The Server Test for Public Display (9th Cir. Perfect 10 vs 2nd Cir. Goldman)
2. Intermediate Ingestion vs Market Substitution (2nd Cir. Authors Guild vs Post-Warhol)
3. Patent Subject Matter Eligibility for Software (Fed. Cir. Narrow vs Technical Improvement Panels)
4. Algorithmic Pricing Cartels & Sherman Act § 1 (4th/9th Cir. RealPage Incline vs 3rd Cir. Flat Glass Direct Agreement)
5. CRISPR-Cas9 Eukaryotic Translation Obviousness (Fed. Cir. Broad vs EPO Strict Inventorship Priority)
6. AI Software Vendor Liability as Statutory "Employment Agency" (9th Cir. Mobley vs 3rd/5th Cir. Direct Privity)
7. Algorithmic Credit Scoring & ECOA Principal Reason Attribution (CFPB Enforcement vs Trade Secret Shield)
8. Admissibility of Generative AI Forensic Audio/Video Enhancement (Strict FRE 901(b)(9) Provenance vs Substantial Verisimilitude)