Juralogium Emblem
JuralogiumThe Architecture of Law
Back to Taxonomy Directory
Taxonomy/Kinematic Law/#autonomous-vehicle-trolley-liability
#autonomous-vehicle-trolley-liabilityHigh Litigation RiskAutonomous Robotics & Kinematic Tort Law
Read on Primary Statutory Source

Algorithmic Harm Allocation & Crash Inevitability

Statutory Hook: Restatement (Third) of Torts: Products Liability § 2(b)

Strict products liability doctrines governing autonomous driving algorithms (FSD/Waymo) that execute split-second harm-allocation trade-offs in unavoidable crash geometries.

Doctrinal Framework & Legal Mechanics

Under Restatement (Third) of Torts § 2(b), a product is defective in design when the foreseeable risks of harm could have been reduced by the adoption of a reasonable alternative design. For autonomous driving algorithms confronting unavoidable collisions, programmed trajectory decisions that minimize aggregate impact while prioritizing occupant safety over pedestrian safety invite severe design defect claims.

Benchmark Precedents (1)
Leading judicial decisions governing this sub-discipline

Nilsson v. General Motors LLC

Decided / Filed (2018)
External Benchmark Precedent
Engineering & Architecture Compliance Advisory
Implement unalterable cryptographic event data recorders (EDRs) capturing 360-degree sensor feeds and trajectory scoring matrices for 10 seconds prior to any kinematic collision event.
Cross-Entity Knowledge Graph Matrix